内能环境 能源、商品和环境法律和政策开发 2022年12月5日Mon:58:54+00 en-US 时钟 一号 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1&lxb_maple_bar_source=lxb_maple_bar_source https://insideenvironmentredesign.covingtonburlingblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2021/06/cropped-cropped-cropped-favicon-3-32x32.png 内能环境 32码 32码 Contractors有机会帮助形状ESG需求 //www.ludikid.com/2021/12/contractors-have-an-opportunity-to-help-shape-esg-requirements/ Sarah Schuler Tue2021年12月14日 碳市场、政策管理 基础设施采购许可 清洁能源 ESG系统 执行命令 FAR 联邦获取规程 联邦采购管委会 联邦承包商 政府合同 净零 证监会 证券交易委员会 社会成本碳 可持续性 //www.ludikid.com/?p=7668 p对齐='Center'###p>解决气候变化问题自拜登总统首日以来一直优先处理问题。 2021年12月8日,拜登总统发布行政命令14057,通过联邦可持续性催化清洁能源产业和工作,其中包括多项面向向联邦收购引入可持续性的要求。最...Continue Reading…

Addressing climate change has been a priority for President Biden since his first day in office.  On December 8, 2021, President Biden continued that focus by issuing Executive Order (EO) 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, which includes a number of requirements directed at introducing sustainability to federal acquisitions.

This most recent EO announces an administration policy to achieve net-zero emissions from federal procurement by 2050 and comes on the heels of the public comment period extension to January 13, 2022 in response to EO 14030, Climate-Related Financial Risk.  Although the administration will likely be rolling out additional sustainability requirements in the coming months, contractors currently have an opportunity to help shape an initial requirement that may end up effectively establishing an environmental, social, and governance or "ESG" reporting requirement.具体地说,联邦获取管理委员会正征求公众评论,以考虑修改联邦获取规则:

>>要求主要的联邦供应商公开披露温室气体排放和气候相关金融风险并设定科学减排目标和

sp样式='pdate-left:40px;'>>确保主要联邦机构采购最大限度地降低气候变化风险,包括要求在采购决策中考虑温室气体排放的社会成本,并在适当可行时优先选择温室气体排放社会成本较低的供应商的标书和建议。

政府当前提案类似于机构一级最近的活动,与美国Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announcing an "all-agency approach" in response to investor demand for ESG-related information.  The SEC is also seeking public comment in an effort to determine whether current climate change disclosures adequately inform investors and as of December 7, 2021 has received 5,867 comments.

In light of the rapidly evolving scope, demands, and attention placed on board and management accountability for sustainable business practices, Covington's multidisciplinary ESG and Sustainability team created an ESG and Sustainability Toolkit as an entry point for analysis, understanding, and tailored advice on this wide ranging topic.

As part of an effort to reduce federal supply chain emissions, President Biden additionally ordered the General Services Administration to "track disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions, emissions reduction targets, climate risk, and other sustainability-related actions by major Federal suppliers, based on information and data collected through supplier disclosure" of greenhouse gas emissions (as discussed in consideration (i) above).

With new reporting, tracking, and emissions reduction targets potentially on the horizon, federal contractors should consider taking the opportunity to shape aspects of new requirements, such as the preferred method of tracking and reporting emissions data, including how to evaluate the social cost of such greenhouse gases.  For example, there would be a number of ways to measure the "social cost" of greenhouse gas emissions, which is generally an estimate of the monetized damages associated with incremental increases in greenhouse gas emissions.  As re-established under EO 13990, the Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases published interim estimates of the social cost of carbon, methane, and nitrous oxide in February 2021 that reflect one method for evaluating emissions data that could ultimately inform requirements imposed on contractors.  Although a coalition of states is currently challenging the administration's use of social cost estimates to calculate regulatory costs and benefits under EO 13990,[1] the notice of public comment for EO 14030 still includes the social cost of greenhouse gases as one potential factor when considering greenhouse gas emissions in federal procurement decisions.

Comments may be submitted on the following questions on or before January 13, 2022 for FAR Case 2021-016 at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FAR-2021-0016-0001:

  1. How can greenhouse gas emissions, including the social cost of greenhouse gases, best be qualitatively and quantitatively considered in Federal procurement decisions, both domestic and overseas?
  2. 什么可用并受尊重方法测量所购或租产品或所服务生命周期中的温室气体排放?
  3. 联邦政府通过国内外采购决策可如何考虑和尽量减少与气候有关的金融风险?
  4. 贵组织将如何提供温室气体排放数据供建议和/或合同性能使用?
  5. 联邦政府应如何验证温室气体排放报告?
  6. 政府应如何优先接受国内外供应商的标书或建议书,以最有效实现减少温室气体排放或降低温室气体排放社会成本?
  7. 政府可如何考虑供应商承诺减少或减少温室气体排放?
  8. 采购决策中考虑温室气体社会成本对小企业产生什么影响? 小企业包括处境不利小企业、妇女拥有小企业、服务性残疾老企业和历史利用不足商业区小企业FAR理事会应如何最优化地将目标与确保小企业机会的努力相匹配?
号2:21-cv-0107La.提交4月22,2021.

Baidu
map