To achieve the desired economies of scale to meet the Administration's goal to transition to 100 percent CFE on a net annual basis by 2030, the Government has signaled that it is willing to combine CFE procurements across multiple agencies, and to extend contract timelines up to 10 years, where appropriate. The RFI seeks to collect the information to support the solicitation process, and, in terms of content, focuses on collecting information on retail electricity supplied CFE in identified competitive retail markets (specifically PJM, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, and NYISO).[2] Respondents are encouraged to provide the following details for each market:
- proposed or recommended approach to meet the Government's CFE goals,
- annual price for retail electricity supplied CFE in a specific market for a range of supply quantities,
- baseline hourly matching percentage for the CFE supply proposed under category 1, and
- portfolio adjustments necessary to increase the percentage CFE match on an hourly (24/7) basis, as proposed under category 3.
In soliciting this information, the RFI includes a series of tables in which interested respondents are invited to insert information about projected supply, storage, and pricing of CFE, though respondents also may choose to submit information in a narrative format. The RFI also invites respondents to address their management of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and other CFE accounting mechanisms, as well as the associated price of this tracking and certification process.
Interested respondents have the opportunity to submit questions about the RFI by February 25, and the deadline for responses is currently March 7, 2022.
[1] Carbon pollution-free electricity means "electrical energy produced from resources that generate no carbon emissions, including marine energy, solar, wind, hydrokinetic (including tidal, wave, current, and thermal), geothermal, hydroelectric, nuclear, renewably sourced hydrogen, and electrical energy generation from fossil resources to the extent there is active capture and storage of carbon dioxide emissions that meets EPA requirements." E.O.14057, 86 Fed.瑞格70935 ,7094213 2021.
Addressing climate change has been a priority for President Biden since his first day in office. On December 8, 2021, President Biden continued that focus by issuing Executive Order (EO) 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability, which includes a number of requirements directed at introducing sustainability to federal acquisitions.
This most recent EO announces an administration policy to achieve net-zero emissions from federal procurement by 2050 and comes on the heels of the public comment period extension to January 13, 2022 in response to EO 14030, Climate-Related Financial Risk. Although the administration will likely be rolling out additional sustainability requirements in the coming months, contractors currently have an opportunity to help shape an initial requirement that may end up effectively establishing an environmental, social, and governance or "ESG" reporting requirement.具体地说,联邦获取管理委员会正征求公众评论,以考虑修改联邦获取规则:
政府当前提案类似于机构一级最近的活动,与美国Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announcing an "all-agency approach" in response to investor demand for ESG-related information. The SEC is also seeking public comment in an effort to determine whether current climate change disclosures adequately inform investors and as of December 7, 2021 has received 5,867 comments.
In light of the rapidly evolving scope, demands, and attention placed on board and management accountability for sustainable business practices, Covington's multidisciplinary ESG and Sustainability team created an ESG and Sustainability Toolkit as an entry point for analysis, understanding, and tailored advice on this wide ranging topic.
As part of an effort to reduce federal supply chain emissions, President Biden additionally ordered the General Services Administration to "track disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions, emissions reduction targets, climate risk, and other sustainability-related actions by major Federal suppliers, based on information and data collected through supplier disclosure" of greenhouse gas emissions (as discussed in consideration (i) above).
With new reporting, tracking, and emissions reduction targets potentially on the horizon, federal contractors should consider taking the opportunity to shape aspects of new requirements, such as the preferred method of tracking and reporting emissions data, including how to evaluate the social cost of such greenhouse gases. For example, there would be a number of ways to measure the "social cost" of greenhouse gas emissions, which is generally an estimate of the monetized damages associated with incremental increases in greenhouse gas emissions. As re-established under EO 13990, the Interagency Working Group on the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases published interim estimates of the social cost of carbon, methane, and nitrous oxide in February 2021 that reflect one method for evaluating emissions data that could ultimately inform requirements imposed on contractors. Although a coalition of states is currently challenging the administration's use of social cost estimates to calculate regulatory costs and benefits under EO 13990,[1] the notice of public comment for EO 14030 still includes the social cost of greenhouse gases as one potential factor when considering greenhouse gas emissions in federal procurement decisions.
Comments may be submitted on the following questions on or before January 13, 2022 for FAR Case 2021-016 at https://www.regulations.gov/document/FAR-2021-0016-0001:
- How can greenhouse gas emissions, including the social cost of greenhouse gases, best be qualitatively and quantitatively considered in Federal procurement decisions, both domestic and overseas?
- 什么可用并受尊重方法测量所购或租产品或所服务生命周期中的温室气体排放?
- 联邦政府通过国内外采购决策可如何考虑和尽量减少与气候有关的金融风险?
- 贵组织将如何提供温室气体排放数据供建议和/或合同性能使用?
- 联邦政府应如何验证温室气体排放报告?
- 政府应如何优先接受国内外供应商的标书或建议书,以最有效实现减少温室气体排放或降低温室气体排放社会成本? 政府可如何考虑供应商承诺减少或减少温室气体排放?
- 采购决策中考虑温室气体社会成本对小企业产生什么影响? 小企业包括处境不利小企业、妇女拥有小企业、服务性残疾老企业和历史利用不足商业区小企业FAR理事会应如何最优化地将目标与确保小企业机会的努力相匹配?